<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>On the Aisle &#187; General</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.theaternewsonline.com/category/general/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.theaternewsonline.com</link>
	<description>Matt Wolf surveys the London/New York scene</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:46:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>GOING GOING GONG!</title>
		<link>http://blog.theaternewsonline.com/2009/03/15/going-going-gong/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.theaternewsonline.com/2009/03/15/going-going-gong/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 17:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London Theatre Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.theaternewsonline.com/index.php/2009/03/15/going-going-gong/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If the Laurence Olivier Awards are handed out and no one is around to hear them, do they make a noise? That thought kept occurring to me during the 34th annual gong-giving knees-up March 8, a great evening that will remain the largely exclusive preserve of those who were there. Some of those involved were [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the <a title="2009 Olivier Awards" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/stage/2009/mar/08/2009-olivier-award-winners">Laurence Olivier Awards </a>are handed out and no one is around to hear them, do they make a noise? That thought kept occurring to me during the 34th annual gong-giving knees-up March 8, a great evening that will remain the largely exclusive preserve of those who were there. Some of those involved were perfectly happy not to have the inevitable tension inbuilt at such occasions broadcast for all to see. &#8220;It doesn&#8217;t feel like a televised event,&#8221; <strong>Steven Hoggett</strong>, the somewhat surprising winner of best theater choreographer for the night&#8217;s big winner,<em> Black Watch</em>, told me in the Great Room of the Grosvenor House, immediately following the ceremony, &#8220;so it has its own integrity. As [best actor winner] <strong>Derek Jacobi</strong> put it, it only happens in this room: we were here; we saw it.&#8221;</p>
<p>And that is so. Whereas the Oliviers were once televised to BBC audiences who numbered in the vicinity of seven million, that long ago ceased to be the case, London&#8217;s nearest equivalent to the Tonys looking on as the show was alternately truncated, delayed for transmission until a later slot (or even a subsequent night), and, eventually, dropped altogether, viewership by that point having slipped below the psychologically crucial threshold of one million.<span id="more-49"></span></p>
<p>Now, the gala dinner-cum-entertainment functions probably as the Oscars and their like used to in the days, pre-television, when Hollywood&#8217;s biggest night was essentially an industry confab with food and drink to calm frayed nerves. And while that&#8217;s no bad thing necessarily, one wonders why some sort of other outlet can&#8217;t be found, in an internet age where perhaps the entire show could be streamed on line or perhaps some interested (and deep-pocketed) cable or satellite channel could pick up the slack. It may sound preposterous, but I for one can&#8217;t help but feel that an American specialist broadcaster might generate a sizable audience for the Oliviers, even though the annual shindig focuses on London theater, ballet, and opera at the exclusion of work from around the regions or productions only seen States-side. The fact is, enough of London&#8217;s cultural diet has a recognizable ring overseas that theater buffs in New York and elsewhere would by no means feel left out of the party. And <em>August: Osage County</em> &#8211; the place name consistently mispronounced by nominee reader <strong>David Suchet</strong>, by the way &#8211; was, after all, up for a slew of prizes and won for <strong>Todd Rosenthal&#8217;s</strong> set.</p>
<p>How many musical theater mavens the world over, for instance, would kill to have seen the richly deserving actor/actress in a musical winners, <strong>Douglas Hodge</strong> and <strong>Elena Roger</strong>, strutting their stuff in solo performance stints at the Oliviers, both in superlative form. For erstwhile <em>La Cage Aux Folles</em> star <strong>Hodge,</strong> who delivered the most achingly truthful &#8220;I Am What I Am&#8221; that I have ever heard, the evening was especially bittersweet since the performer&#8217;s father had died exactly three days earlier. &#8220;I wasn&#8217;t going to come [to the ceremony], and my mom phoned me and said, `If you don&#8217;t go, I&#8217;ll never forgive you; he would love you to go.&#8217;&#8221; It turned out, too, that Hodge senior had shifted 180 degrees in his personal view of his son&#8217;s trophy-bearing role as Albin, aka the drag artiste Zaza. &#8220;When I was offered the part, if I&#8217;m honest, my dad said, `I don&#8217;t think you should do it: what&#8217;s it going to be &#8212; distasteful? sleazy?&#8217;&#8221; an emotional Hodge told me at evening&#8217;s end. &#8220;And it won him over; the show won him over because it&#8217;s about family and love and commitment and long relationships: everything he believed in. It breaks my heart that he&#8217;s not here tonight.&#8221;</p>
<p>It breaks my heart that no one outside the hotel itself got the full sweep of a night compered by the inimitable James Nesbitt, the cheeky Irish actor who kept a lengthy evening swinging along (a dinner interval included) without evident use of an autocue (and, presumably, none of the sort of earpiece assistance so favored by <strong>Richard Dreyfuss</strong> of late at the Old Vic). I was very sorry that <em>The Norman Conquests</em> didn&#8217;t win anything, though there was recompense after a fashion in the stupendously moving special award that was given to its author, <strong>Alan Ayckbourn</strong>, in recognition of a prolific career that is quite simply without peer. And co-presenting the prize (with <strong>Ayckbourn </strong>regular <strong>Liza Goddard</strong>), Old Vic supremo <strong>Kevin Spacey</strong> quite sensibly opted this time to shake the playwright&#8217;s hand, lest we get a repeat of the incident at the end of the trilogy&#8217;s triumphant press day last fall when <strong>Spacey&#8217;s</strong> overenthusiastic bear hug sent the enfeebled scribe tumbling into the first row of the audience.</p>
<p>The speeches were virtually without fail graceful and gracious, <strong>Jacobi </strong>considerably more touching as he fondled his Olivier &#8211; paying rich tribute to the trophy&#8217;s namesake &#8211; than he was as Malvolio in <em>Twelfth Night</em>. Indeed, even though I didn&#8217;t agree with some of the choices of winners, it was worth their moment in the spotlight to hear what they had to say. &#8220;I&#8217;m so excited! I&#8217;m sorry; I&#8217;m American,&#8221; enthused<em> Zorro&#8217;s</em> visiting Yank, <strong>Lesli Margherita</strong>, who copped the prize for outstanding supporting performance in a musical. <strong>Margherita </strong>then went on to proclaim of her cast with disarming candour, &#8220;I love, like, 95% of you.&#8221; One assumes the remaining five percent took the implicit knock with an oh-so-British stuff upper lip.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.theaternewsonline.com%2F2009%2F03%2F15%2Fgoing-going-gong%2F&amp;title=GOING%20GOING%20GONG%21" id="wpa2a_2"><img src="http://blog.theaternewsonline.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.theaternewsonline.com/2009/03/15/going-going-gong/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MUCH ADO ABOUT DURHAM</title>
		<link>http://blog.theaternewsonline.com/2009/03/08/much-ado-about-durham/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.theaternewsonline.com/2009/03/08/much-ado-about-durham/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 15:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London Theatre Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.theaternewsonline.com/index.php/2009/03/08/much-ado-about-durham/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It was the National Theatre&#8217;s inestimable artistic director, Nicholas Hytner, who quite rightly advised theater critics several years ago to get out more, by which he meant, Go to the opera and ballet, see films and listen to music, since all these activities inform our weekly immersion in the theater. How right he is. But [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was the <strong>National Theatre&#8217;s</strong> inestimable artistic director, <strong>Nicholas Hytner</strong>, who quite rightly advised theater critics several years ago to get out more, by which he meant, Go to the opera and ballet, see films and listen to music, since all these activities inform our weekly immersion in the theater. How right he is. But there&#8217;s another imperative, less frequently heeded, that, I think, makes a difference, as well: taking a chance on the new generation of practitioners who with luck will become the subjects of professional critical scrutiny and analysis over time. By that, I don&#8217;t mean forays into amateur dramatics (or, as the British call it, AmDram) &#8212; though I have had fun cheering on my great friend Helena in numerous endeavours, from Noel Coward to Shakespeare to panto, courtesy her enterprising local theatre troupe in the Hampshire town of West Meon. (We&#8217;ll pass politely over the version of <em>The Elephant Man</em> that I was once dragged to somewhere in the wilds of north London, in which a work colleague at the time was playing the title role.)</p>
<p>But it was with a view towards seeing tomorrow&#8217;s exciting theatrical prospects today that I seized the opportunity the other week to spend four days as one of that same number of adjudicators (three American, one British, London impresario and Durham Univ. graduate <strong>Giles Ramsay</strong>) at the <strong>34th Durham Drama Festival</strong> in the ceaselessly stunning northern English cathedral town. Well, that and the prospect to relive however briefly my own university days, since Yale itself utilises<a title="Durham University website " href="matt wolf durham university" target="_blank"> the very system of residential colleges found at Durham </a>and, well before that, at Oxford and Cambridge, the scholastic elder statesmen that pioneered this particular collegiate model.<span id="more-35"></span></p>
<p>Unlike Yale, Durham rather surprisingly doesn&#8217;t offer any proper study in drama, which makes the activities of its theater-minded students even more a labor of love. Hearing about campus productions of <em>Company</em> and <em>The Pillowman </em>reminded me very much of my years in New Haven, when the likes of <em>Pal Joey, Fiddler On the Roof, Equus</em>, and <em>Waiting For Godot</em> would be mounted, often for three or four nights only, the casts at the time including such eventual Tony winners as <strong>Victoria Clark, Michael Cerveris</strong>, and <strong>David Hyde Pierce</strong>, to name but a few. Pierce&#8217;s fellow tramp in a Trumbull College staging of Godot was none other than a then-unknown <strong>Bronson Pinchot</strong>.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s invidious and unfair to guess which of a first-rate assemblage of Durham actors, most of them age 20 give or take a year, will end up going the distance, though one of them, an actor-singer named <strong>Matt Johnson</strong>, already has a place studying music in London once he finishes his Durham degree. (Johnson is also writing a thesis on Sondheim&#8217;s <em>Merrily We Roll Along</em>, which he will be directing this summer.) But on the basis of the eleven shows I caught during my visit, the talent exists in spades. A 30-year-old PhD candidate from the Irish city of Cork, <strong>Donnchadh O&#8217; Conaill</strong>, wrote the play that we judged to be the best of the lot, a witty and affecting solo piece wonderfully titled <em>Interior Designer of My Own Downfall</em> &#8211; clearly the contemporary theater&#8217;s equivalent, in the nomenclature sweepstakes, to <em>Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind</em>. Its gratifyingly unself-conscious cast of one, <strong>Ben Salter</strong>, was named best actor at the event, having reportedly won the same award last year, as well: a third win next year and Salter will have pulled off a hat trick not even accomplished by <strong>Tom Hanks</strong> at the Oscars.</p>
<p>There was much else to praise, as well, starting with O&#8217;Conaill&#8217;s deadpan gifts as performer during an afternoon of comedy and a delicious improvised musical on the closing night entitled <em>The Chair, The Dog, and The Monkey Named Harry</em> that easily bested such recent London lulus as <em>Imagine This</em> and <em>Marguerite</em> &#8211; though that, I realize, is faint praise indeed for a show that was effortlessly smart and fresh. Through it all, Festival Director <strong>Oscar Blustin</strong> made his gracious, seemingly imperturbable way, on the final night receiving a standing ovation from a packed-out university theater whose thirst for drama was evident across any and all conversations, no matter how late into the night. And not just drama: the dining hall of my elegant <strong>Durham Castle</strong> digs within minutes of the town&#8217;s surpassingly beautiful 11th-century Cathedral was mounting a buzzed-about production of Bizet&#8217;s <em>Carmen.</em></p>
<p>I very much liked a play called <em>Orange Peel</em> (though cut the coda!) by a 19-year-old, <strong>James Morton</strong>, and found myself casting company member Tessa Coates as Honey in a purely hypothetical <em>Who&#8217;s Afraid of Virginia Woolf?,</em> in which the same student play&#8217;s leading lady, <strong>Stevie Martin</strong>, could well make a formidable Martha. Will such events come to pass? Who can say, though budding professional director <strong>Blustin </strong>is preparing a summer tour of <em>Twelfth Night</em>, auditions for which had some of the group in an amiable tizz. The pleasure in Durham lay in watching so much embryonic passion for the theater come to the fore, and why not? A life in the theater, to coopt the title of a <strong>David Mamet</strong> play, is a good one in no matter what capacity, and it is with great pleasure that I welcome these students to it.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.theaternewsonline.com%2F2009%2F03%2F08%2Fmuch-ado-about-durham%2F&amp;title=MUCH%20ADO%20ABOUT%20DURHAM" id="wpa2a_4"><img src="http://blog.theaternewsonline.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.theaternewsonline.com/2009/03/08/much-ado-about-durham/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GENDER SPECIFIC</title>
		<link>http://blog.theaternewsonline.com/2009/03/08/gender-specific-2/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.theaternewsonline.com/2009/03/08/gender-specific-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 14:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London Theatre Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.theaternewsonline.com/index.php/2009/03/08/gender-specific-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m the first to nod in agreement when women directors chafe at articles that inevitably lump them all together. We are directors who happen to be women, they are quick to reply, not Women Directors (capital letters mine). And yet, I couldn&#8217;t help but feel that gender makes a discernible difference &#8211; and thrillingly so [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m the first to nod in agreement when women directors chafe at articles that inevitably lump them all together. We are directors who happen to be women, they are quick to reply, not Women Directors (capital letters mine). And yet, I couldn&#8217;t help but feel that gender makes a discernible difference &#8211; and thrillingly so &#8211; as regards the newly opened Old Vic revival of Brian Friel&#8217;s luminous Dancing At Lughnasa, which is directed by a woman, Anna Mackmin, whereas Tony winner Patrick Mason directed the play the first time around.</p>
<p>Telling of five spinster sisters inhabiting the same tumultuous Ballybeg, Co. Donegal, household in 1936, Lughnasa indeed benefits from the careful attention afforded it from Mackmin, who is quietly growing into one of Britain&#8217;s most confident and compassionate directors: her West End incarnation last year of David Eldridge&#8217;s Under the Blue Sky was one of the glories of 2008, its absence from the year-end handing out of gongs puzzling to this day. <span id="more-34"></span></p>
<p>For one thing, you get a real sense here of the physical intimacy between the Mundy sisters and the way in which they act in differing ways as one another&#8217;s protectors. There&#8217;s a natural ease between Niamh Cusack&#8217;s ready quipster Maggie and Michelle Fairley&#8217;s wrenching schoolteacher Kate that finds the two eldest of the five readily intertwining arms as if to buttress themselves against the cruel world that Peter McDonald&#8217;s narrator, Michael &#8211; a surpassingly empathic performance &#8211; tells us about at wounding length. Elsewhere, when the &#8220;simple&#8221; sister Rose (Simone Kirby) returns from an assignation, her bespectacled sibling, Agnes (Susan Lynch), pauses to do up her blouse before reintroducing her to an anxious household: a small but telling detail in a production full of the same.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not that a male director is innately incapable of such feeling: Mason&#8217;s production made considerably more, for instance, of the sheer ecstasy informing the sisters&#8217; first-act dance &#8211; a moment that, for many spectators, the original Tony winning production never again matched. One could argue, however, that Mackmin is right not to present the dance as such an obvious set piece; there&#8217;s no opportunity, for instance, for this image of momentary release to garner applause in the way that it sometimes did all those years ago. (Hard to believe I first saw this play in 1990, since it has stayed with me so completely in the nearly two decades since.)</p>
<p>But I don&#8217;t recall that earlier go-round providing such a full sense of a household knitted together by care and concern even as it is about to become undone altogether. And near the end, when Michael in his reveries reaches across the divide of memory to stroke the chin of his mother, Chris (Irish singer Andrea Corr in a notable stage debut), a single gesture serves to encapsulate the reservoirs of feeling coursing through a play that leaves you floating in accordance with the language of Michael&#8217;s gently exalted final speech.</p>
<p>Are women directors therefore condemned only to do delicate, &#8220;intimate&#8221; work, leaving the more macho requirements of the job to their male colleagues? Not at all. Easily the most testosterone-fuelled National Theater production in recent years was Marianne Elliott&#8217;s summer, 2007, production of Saint Joan, much of the excitement of which came from the play&#8217;s lone female, star Anne-Marie Duff, fully holding her own amidst a rabidly blokish ensemble. I&#8217;d put money on Duff&#8217;s performance being less compelling without Elliott on hand to drive at, just as the presence of Phyllida Lloyd at the helm redoubled the power of her Mary Stuart leads, Janet McTeer and Harriet Walter: let&#8217;s hope that magic is retained for the Schiller revival&#8217;s forthcoming Broadway run.</p>
<p>In the meantime, London has a new Lughnasa to treasure, which must surely have a life beyond its limited run. (The play is scheduled to close May 9.) But when those stage sisters &#8211; and the fine trio of men in the cast, as well &#8211; come together for their bows, you&#8217;d be well advised to imagine another woman up there bowing with them: Mackmin, a director in superlative control of a play about the last summer before a family&#8217;s life was overtaken by chaos.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.theaternewsonline.com%2F2009%2F03%2F08%2Fgender-specific-2%2F&amp;title=GENDER%20SPECIFIC" id="wpa2a_6"><img src="http://blog.theaternewsonline.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.theaternewsonline.com/2009/03/08/gender-specific-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

